Did the Vic Electrical Trade Unions's Dean Mighell phone Transvestites while on a "junket " trip to the UK ?

"Lara Bingle scoop  nude photo's"  yes...if you're here because you're looking for Lara in the altogether, forget it. You need to be admonished because of a shallow mental outlook. Get SERIOUS and see what a bunch of scumbags are doing to your community!

 ARTICLE.
According to a source close to the ETU, Dean Mighell went on a trip to the UK at great cost to the ETU members, to examine how superannuation can be better incorporated into the Union sitution.  Apparently he didn't have to look far because according to this source, he could have found out the information from a much cheaper phone call or video conference. (This disgusted source is no longer with the union)

Then it get's darker... this source claimed that he was 'busted' making phone calls to transvestites from his hotel.

That's as much as I was able to glean from this source who, for obvious reasons must not be named.

Apparently this incident was widely reported.

Mighell responded (to the Herald Sun)

"I did not make the phone call. I did not know the purpose or content
of the phone call. I want to make clear that no escort service was
ever provided.
"I have made inquiries today and been informed it was a prank phone call."

 Well... you'd say that anyway, whether it was true or false. just like poor Craig Thompson is saying all he is about the way his Phone, Licence and Credit card all just .. "mysteriously" happened to be used to arrange for hookers on the HSU tab.

I actually feel a bit sorry for Thompson... he's had a grilling for sure, and by twits who are far from perfect..and might benefit greatly from reading the Biblical account of "he who is without sin may cast the first stone".  I'll have more sympathy with him though when he hangs his political hat up and bows out while he still has a tiny shred of doubt surrounding him. Craig..think of your family for crying out loud!!!

But Mighell? I don't see a shred of humility..not an inkling.. it is arrogance and 'megalomania' in my view all the way to the bank. Having visited a number of building sites recently, I've see the swaggering fat bellied ETU "Organizers" on site..doing nothing but looking arrogant.

Oh how it raised the spectre of "poetic justice" when the 300+ sparkies lost their VERY high paying jobs with the Hastie Group which went down in a screaming heap last week, much like "Globadyne" in Fun with Dick and Jane.
The infuriating thing though, is that none of the gutless Journalists asked whether the ETU officials thought the outrageously high (Electrical) labor costs had anything to do with the failure of the company?  Mighell was bragging that HE got "$107k" base salary on a 4 day week for sparkies.
Hmm... I wonder how much the Union will lose now with 300 times union dues not coming in.

Well.. Mighell, like Hitler, will eventually discover "justice" and when that day comes.. this blog will celebrate with particular vigour.  I suppose though that until that day draweth nigh, Mighell will be oblivious to the true mood of the community which increasingly loathes and despises him.

Do you know who Senator Sarah Hanson-Young is ?

That's the question I have posed to a large number of people spread across Melbourne in the past week.
I orginally began by asking "If you had the chance to say something to Senator Sarah Hanson Young -what would you say"

16 out of 20 people didn't even know who she is.  The 4 who DID expressed the following reactions.

1/ Italian truck driver who lived in Socialst Italy. "aarh..shoot the bastards, those Greens tried to run the show in Italy, and eventually they started turning up dead, now they don't say much"

2/ Printer.  "Hurl a grenade at her/them"

3/ Storelady "Rolls eyes"

4/ Office worker. "no comment"

When you explain to those who don't know her, that she is the one calling for ASIO to have a separate 'nanny' person to supervise their assesments and to give those who already have a 'dangerous' tag from Asio an opportunity to challenge the information on which Asio formed their assesment, and for them to be released into the community..wellll.. the emotion and anger arcs up quickly.

One thing is clear, the Greens and their defacto Leader Sarah Hanson-Young are not in any way seeking to gain the vote of the broader Aussie public. Nope...it's about minorities, ethnic cliques, and marginal country shoppers.  When you think of it..... *it works* for them... as they now have control of our Senate.

Perhaps it's time for the broader Aussie Public to actually wake up ?  *poke poke*.

The Enlightenment... or the Endarkenment? a Critical evaluation of Locke,Rouseau,Lessing

Once upon a time..(all good stories start like that right?)  -there was this young good looking Frenchman (Swiss?) in Geneva  names Jean Jacques (Rousseau). He used to sit up late at night with his watchmaker father reading sentimental novels.. (his dear mum had passed away during childbirth)

One day, after reaching maturity he found himself locked out of the city after the gates were closed. Rather than beat the door down, or throw a couple of attention getting rocks at the nearest watchtower, Jean Jacques decided instead to 'see the world' so...off he went to other places... higher up in France and found himself in the company of an older woman he called "Mama" and to whom he sold himself for sex as a gigolo.

At the age of 37, he was going to visit a friend of his named Diderot, who was in jail for some censorship infringement. This is the Diderot who in 1751, co founded a document called the Encyclopedie...the first attempt to put in accessible and systematic form all the knowledge of the world.

On this journey to the place of Diderot's incarceration, Jean Jacques, (by now around 37) saw a poster which advertized a competition for an essay.. the subject matter was "Has the progress in the arts and sciences contributed more to the advancement or deterioration in morality?". Well.... this impacted the emotional Jean Jacques like a falling glacier on a row boat and he was overwhelmed with feelings from every part of the spectrum. After recovering from the initial impact of what this unleashed in Jean Jacques mind, he set about writing to win this competition. He took the 'negative' view and held that the progress of science etc and the associated institutions had utterly hammered morality (remember this bloke sold himself for sex to an older woman) to the point of near death.

After winning the competition, and gaining instant fame for his eloquent prose and powerful vocabulary, Jean Jacques decided to take a job as a "Tutor". In another later volume titled "Confessions" where he lays open his heart and life and deeds, he explains how he 'sucked' (to use modern slang) at this occupation and sought help from another high profile figure of the time who he much admired.

That person was John Locke the English Philosopher (who had puritan parents) who contributed greatly to modern liberalism and the concept of the State, but Jean Jacques main interest was in Locke's theories of education and psychology. He wanted to discover the 'ideal' means of educating a person who would, because of this perfect education, attain 'virtue' without reference to God, and without the strict guidance of the Church.

Jean Jacques embraced John Locke's view that man was not born with original sin... and this was his starting point for the creation of his ideal character "Emile".   Emile was written with the idea of exploring and establishing this new enlightened, 'reason based' eductional model. Jean Jacques did this in 5 volumes and ladies beware... volume 5 will not sit well with you if you hold strongly independant and feminist views.... *you have been warned*.

In the script....i.e.the book, Jean Jacques constructs an educational plaform which does not dictate the need for reading or writing before Emile is 'ready'... which means when he knows the real world meaning of words such as "justice" etc.

Long story short.. "Emile" becomes the philosophical darling and toy boy of the enlightenment and liberal tradition, and they push forward with this approach as a strong factor in their thinking. Emile is.. emancipated and independant of the Church!  "Hip hip hooray the liberals would cheer" (in my apocryphal mind).  But interestingly, a couple of people actually tried to raise children using Jean Jacques methods as spelt out in Emile. It not only didn't work, it failed miserably.

We might observe, that "when you write the script...the ending is assured" but in real life???  err.. not quite so easy.. the other main observation of Jean Jacques life is that while he incorporated "No original sin" into the construction of "Emile" (and Jean Jacques on world view) he actually proved the opposite by his own behavior. Not only was he a gigolo, he also fathered a number of children out of wedlock and abandoned them...  I suppose the easy 'work around' on this is to simply re-define "sin" and evil to be "Anything I don't do that I consider so" and this lets you off the hook to do whatever you consider not to be 'sin' or evil. "Heyyyy..whatsup with abandoning a few fragile vulnerable kids.... no problemo, plenty of peasant women out there who want another baby"... and so it goes on.  As I said... when you write the script..the ending/outcome is assured and it will be 'happy ever after'. Reality though, tends to bite you in the rear end!

The enlightenment was characterized by these things.
-Emanicpation of man from the Church. (But with Deistic background music)
-Seeking an alternative source for authority than the Church, to understand the universe and to relate the individual to it.

This is rather surreal and needs close examination. The problem for some enlightenment figures was that they felt the Church or a 'theological' framework for life would inhibit scientific enquiry and stifle creativity and discovery.   *Ouch*.... but consider this, the man described the late Professor George Mosse of  the University of Wisconsin calls Blaise Pascal the "last great Christian Intellectual" prior to the enlightenment. Pascal was a genius, child prodegy and invented the first 'computer'...a mathematical calculating machine. He contributed amazingly to the science of mathematics and physics. Was a a reformed  evangelical Christian.  He demonstrated that science was not in the slightest bit inhibited by a Church or Theistic social framework.

Looking back now at Jean Jacques Rousseou's life, (and inclinations) one is tempted and enticed to the attractive conclusion that the issue for Rousseau was not scientific or theistic...but moral. He lived a life that most would call promiscuous.

The Influence of "Emile" (the reader can sus this out separately for more information).
Clearly, this idea of an emancipated autonomous indivual was attractive to the increasing number of endarkened minds (oops..sorry. "EnLIGHTened").. and one such mind was Gotthold Lessing, born in 1729,a German Jew who worked as a Writer, Philsopher, Dramatist, Art Critic, Publicist.

Lessing embraced this enlightened thinking and looked for an example of this from within his own ethno religious community, and he found his star in the form of Moses Mendelssohn.  Lessing regarded Mendellsohn as a truly emancipated Jew...no longer held captive by his own theological or religious traditions within Judaism, but set FREE by 'reason'. In his influential play titled "Nathan the Wise", he casts a number of useful characters which include:

-Daya the humble "supersticious Christian" housemaid
-Nathan the 'rich merchant'.(The emancipated Jew)
-The Patriarch (representing the pre enlightenment despotic Church world view.... the 'villain')
-The Templar (who increasingly doubts his religious convictions due to Nathan's raw 'reason')
-Sultan Saladin the Muslim.

All these characters, (as for Emile) follow Lessing's script and the utopian ending once again is assured. Lessings objective in this play is to show how religious tolerance and enlightented emancipated thinking is the most desirable condition of mankind.

But that's the 'kicker' as they say..... once more...reality bites Lessing as it bit Rousseau... people are not particularly tolerant of different views.... but this is greatly exacerbated when there are issues of power balances, trade and commerce involved. We should keep in mind that in the back of Lessing and Rousseau (and Locke)'s minds.. was the 30 yrs war between various European states where to the observer it could appear that they were only about 'religious differences'. You know that saying "Religion is the cause of all wars"... (rolls eyes)

We see in both Lessing's Nathan and Rousseau's Emile, two examples of the desired utopian  conditon for mankind... but one need only to look at the important differences between Saladin's Islamic religion and Lockes Christianity. The two are vastly and totally incompatible. Saladin's Islam specifically aims to subjugate the world by military force, though not force immediate conversion. Locke's Christianity want's to subjugate the heart "Blessed are the meek, for they will inherit the earth" (Matt 5:5). Meek people don't take up swords or M16's and blast they way to that inheritance. By contrast, Saladin's Islam calls on Muslims to "Fight those who do not believe in Allah and the last day"(9:29)

Lessing's Nathan and Rousseau's Emile.. desirable?  Absolutely, but achievable?  never.  Dare I state  it?...  the reason?... "Original Sin".

Jacob Quilligan-Gay Activist and Christian hater?

This Jason character, wrote an alarming and disturbing email to MP for Frankston Geoff Shaw. (vic)

Here is a sample of his shameless bias and anti Christian hatred.

It is appropriate that people with religious beliefs be able to say who can or cannot join their congregation or attend one of their religious ceremonies or be appointed as a priest/ pastor etc. However when a religious organisation or individual is engaged in the provision of things such as education, health, welfare or commercial/retail services, they should have to comply with the anti-discrimination laws in the same way that everyone does.
To give religious people and organisations additional legal privileges and protections over other groups in society is totally against notions of fairness and social justice.


It's nice the Jacob gives his majesterial permission for Religious organizations to decide who can and cannot be employed or join their congregations. But his rather high opinion of himself  and his overstretched 'rights' idea sees him going into the territory normally inhabited by Tyrants!

He believes a religious organization which provides some kind of service like education etc should not be exempt from Equal Opportunity law and discrimination law. Well.. we should remember that up until hatefilled and hate fuelled groups like his harassed and lobbied the Labor Government of Brumby to IMPOSE their ideas about discrimination and remove excemptions, they existed without issue.

There is absolutely no reason whatsoever why a Christian or Religious  educational facility 'should' employ people who do not share their convictions. If they did, the likelihood of those non 'them' employees imparting information through their own ideological filter is just too high. Then there is the issue of staff fraternization and social interaction. One cannot imagine a group of Jewish teachers feeling comfortable mingling with the one "National Socialist" thinking teacher at their religious school who happened to be employed there after he whined to the 'Equal Opportunity' commission about initially being discriminated against because he was not "Jewish" in his thinking.

The whole notion of putting the squeeze on religious schools or any of the branches of religious organizations listed in Quilligans distasteful email, is absurd, insulting and in itself discriminatory.

We should never forget, that the real agenda of the Gay rights groups is not to 'conform' Religious groups to some law, but it is to absolutely destroy them. (in particular the christian ones). They must be destroyed because people who's thinking is founded in the Bible, will always regard homosexual behavior as an 'abomination'. Just like they regard incest and bestiality as 'abominations'.

Quilligan should get of his high horse named 'hate' and start reflecting on how to be nice for a change.
Tolerance is not his strongest Virtue, and he is clearly very uncompassionate about his fellow citizens who don't share his own beliefs.  His position is as close to bigotry as it gets.

Lara Bingle Nude...again... Member for Frankston outrages Gays with 'homophobic' comment

It appears the "Victorian Gay and Lesbian Rights Lobby" in general and a constituent of the Frankston area Jakob Quilligan in particular were very offended when Mr Shaw, the Liberal member for Frankston, suggested that allowing a gay man to 'love who he wanted' was  tantamount to  suggesting that his desire to love who he wanted was "as illegitimate as a dangerous driver wanting to speed or a child molester wanting to molest."

Perhaps Mr Shaw would have better served his position by relating "love who you like" to the situation epitomized by Peter Trebilco OAM who began having gay sex at the age of 11....hanging around public toilets seeking anonymous homosexual experiences. Trebilco is on the faculty of University of Western Sydney in the "Public Health" dept. and is a gay activist.   Perhaps Mr Shaw could have mentioned that Dennis Fergusan also want's to 'love who he likes' which includes little girls and possibly little boys like Trebilco when he was 11.  Perhaps the gay lobby would like to challenge "intergenerational sex" laws in the not too distant future?


In his letter, Mr Quilligan told Mr Shaw that churches should not be allowed to ''impose their beliefs on others … in non-religious/mainstream or secular settings''.

The fact is, that having religious organizations requiring credentials which are in harmony with their fundamental convictions, irrespective of whether it's the cleaner, gardiner or whoever,  is their basic human right and no matter how much Quilligan and ilk would like it to be otherwise.. it is a fact.  There is absolutely no "imposition" of religious belief on an applicant for an employment position when they know full well that the exemptions and exceptions exist in law.

Appropriate credentials for such positions include sexual orientation.

The bottom line is, that unless Churches and faith communities which hold to a 'heterosexual' world view stand up and are counted (at the Ballot box and the public arena) the true dark agenda of the so-called "equality/rights" lobby VGLR which is... to change not just the law, but also 'attitudes' will prevail.

I doubt they are interested in 'heart' change as a realistic person will know that you cannot change the inside. The most they can (and I guarantee do!) hope for is a legal framework which makes it an offence to so much as 'blink' in a way which can be construed as 'homophobic'..and then their mission will be complete.

At present it is not an offence to stand in a public place and display a poster saying "Same sex marriage is cruel to children" Offensive yes...but illegal no.  How offensive is it though that a person can display such a poster, and then be possibly attacked and vilified for expressing their democratic opinion and seeking to persuade others of that opinion? 

"Emile" Rousseau's approach to education- Lara Bingle could use some of his techniques..

Rousseau’s philosophy of education is not concerned with particular techniques of imparting information and concepts, but rather with developing the pupil’s character and moral sense, so that he may learn to practice self-mastery and remain virtuous even in the unnatural and imperfect society(Wiki)

Interesting concept, but it must be remarked that Rousseau himself worked as a Gigolo and fathered children out of wedlock and then abandoned them.  It appears that he had a high morality in his mind, but could not practice it in the real world.
Driven,  it would appear, by the sex drives and the willingness to do 'whatever' it took to be maintained, we should look not to Rousseau for guidance, but more to that document which explains the inadequacy of Rousseau's approach and specifically his own failure to live up to it.

Of course I speak of the Bible.  In particular the letter of Paul to the Romans. Paul goes to considerable lengths to explain the'

-State of Nature  (Hobbes Rousseau)
-Natural Man (ditto)
-Original sin. (Hobbes in part, but not Rousseau)

Romans 1
¹⁸ The wrath of God is being revealed from heaven against all the godlessness and wickedness of people, who suppress the truth by their wickedness, ¹⁹ since what may be known about God is plain to them, because God has made it plain to them. ²⁰ For since the creation of the world God’s invisible qualities—his eternal power and divine nature—have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that people are without excuse.

²⁶ Because of this, God gave them over to shameful lusts. Even their women exchanged natural sexual relations for unnatural ones. ²⁷ In the same way the men also abandoned natural relations with women and were inflamed with lust for one another. Men committed shameful acts with other men, and received in themselves the due penalty for their error. 

Rom 3:22  There is no difference between Jew and Gentile, ²³ for all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God,

That last verse clearly declares all mankind to be fundamentally 'flawed' and in sin. Given that we have yet to find a well documented 'perfect natural man' (other than Christ) we may rest confidently in the truth of such a declaration.

Notice how homosexual acts are declared to be 'shameful' and 'unnatural'.  But there's more, they will also 'receive due penalty' for their error.  That due penalty is not to be administered by mankind..ie it is not a human punishment, though it can be, when homosexual behavior is made unlawful by democratic process.  The 'due penalty' spoken of here is more likely, in this blogs view, the eternal justice of the Almighty for those who carry out this practice with the stubborn refusal to refrain from exercising their same sex urges and lusts. Many gay men have clearly demonstrated that they can be married to women and have successful families, but sadly, only to 'come out' later in life, possibly causing untold anguish and suffering on the abandoned family.

This same 'eternal justice' applies to the person who is 'intergenerationally' attracted. ie.. Paedophilea.
They may well feel 'I was born this way', and desperately long for a day when Herbert Marcuse's "Polymorphous Perversity"(a) is part of our legal framework setting them free to do what they please. 








"Eros and Civilization" Herbert Marcuse.
that synthesizes Karl Marx and Sigmund Freud. One of Marcuse's best known works, its title alludes to Freud's Civilization and Its Discontents. Marcuse's vision of a non-repressive society, based on Marx and Freud, anticipated the values of 1960s countercultural social movements.

Doctors for the Family and Gay Marriage-Lara Bingle is gay ?

There's a lot of chatter about this group since Dr Kuruvilla George made his involvement with Doctors for Families and position known in regard to same sex marriage.

Their arguments have been attacked and they have been attacked. The uber hypocrisy though is where the Human Rights Commission can (according to Andrew Bolt) have a "pro" gay float in a public procession, but a Dr on the HRC cannot have a private opinion which is publicly expressed in a medical forum?

This blog simply wishes to point out what should be the bleeding obvious.

1/ Same sex 'marraige' is ridiculous and not normal. (except in their own minds)
2/ Normality must be based on a broad conception of humanity and it beggers belief that anyone with a rational capability would consider 2 males or 2 females together in 'marriage' as being 'normal', given our  long extended human history.
3/ That children brought up in gay/same sex 'families' are being seriously abused by being denied the mum and dad that all children are the product of.

The child of a man who married, then abandoned is wife for his gay lover says:

"To me it's perfectly normal, I haven't really experienced any other way of having a family, so I've grown up with it all my life and I'm happy with it." (source)

I can only imagine how much pain this awful set of events has caused the mum. The children obviously live with the mother, and 'visit' the homosexual father and his partner.

This man could have continued on with his heterosexual family and provided complete normality for his children, but no...he 'had' to have regular homosexual experiences.

Those who justify this are very loathe to agree that if this mans tendency was toward 'children' such as those of the age of 11 as Peter Trebilco was when he first started to have homosexual encounters at public toilets, he would be shunned by society which (at this stage) still attaches a dark stigma to men who want sex with children..we call them paedophiles!

Same sex marriage would just be one more downward stumble in the general moral decline in Australia, and the next step is of course the destigmatization of intergenerational sex when the same activist tactics are used by the Paedophiles for 'equality'.....